May 2008 MAT Analysis
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
In May 2008 MAT paper, Quantitative Ability, Verbal Ability, Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation sections were all of average difficulty level, having quite a few questions in each section that could be easily managed.
Executive Summary:
The basic sequence of section with possible attempts was as follows:
|
Section |
No. of Questions |
Possible Attempts |
Time Required |
Expected Score |
| Reasoning |
40 |
19 |
35 |
15 + |
| QA |
40 |
21 |
35 |
17 + |
| DI and DS |
40 |
22 |
35 |
18 + |
| G.A. |
40 |
8 |
10 |
6 + |
| Language |
40 |
20 |
35 |
15 + |
|
Total |
200 |
90 |
150 |
65 + (excluding GK) |
SECTION I: LOGICAL REASONING:
This has been the scoring area for many students in the recent MAT papers. The questions can be broadly classified as:
| Analytical Reasoning |
These were mixed bag questions with broad breakup as under:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Logical Reasoning |
The broader breakup of this section was as follows:
|
SECTION II: QUANTITATIVE ABILITY
This section was good for students to enhance there scores. All time favorite arithmetic was very prominent. The topic wise break up of the questions was as follows:
| Topic | No. of Questions | Level of Difficulty |
| Percentages | 3 | Easy-Average |
| Ratio n proportion | 9 | Easy |
| Averages | 3 | Easy |
| Time Speed Distance | 5 | Easy-Average |
| Time n Work | 3 | Easy-Average |
| Geometry | 1 | |
| Mensuration | 4 | Easy |
| Trigonometry | 2 | Easy |
| Clocks Calenders | 4 | Easy |
| Permutations and Probability | 4 | Average |
| Number System and Misc | 2 | Average |
SECTION III: DATA INTERPRETATION
This was a easier section as compared to last 2 MAT’s. The easy part was DS and Quantitative Comparison questions. The summary was as under:
| Type | No. of Quest |
Difficulty Level |
| Tables based set |
4 (1 set) |
Average |
| Traingular graph |
4 (1 set) |
Easy |
| Bar graph |
8(2 sets) |
Average-Difficult |
| Pie chart |
4 (1 set) |
Average-Difficult |
| Multiple Line graph |
3 ( 1 set) |
Average-Difficult |
| Caselet |
5 ( 1 set) |
Average |
| Data Sufficiency |
6 |
Easy |
| Quantitative Comparison |
6 |
Easy |
SECTION IV: READING COMPREHENSION AND ENGLISH USAGE
This was again a section of moderate difficulty level. Let us take a closer look at this section!
* Total no. of Questions: 40
* No. of RC passages: 5
* Questions from RC passages: 20
* Questions from EU: 20
Analysis of English Usage:
|
|
No. of Qs |
Difficulty level |
|
Para jumbled |
4 |
Average |
|
Ward Analogies |
4 |
Average |
|
Sentence Corrections |
4 |
Difficult |
|
Idioms and phrases |
4 |
Average |
|
Fill in the blanks |
4 |
Average |
RC Passages & Questions:
| Passages |
No. of Qs |
Difficulty level |
| Financial Inclusions and Banking systems |
4 |
Difficult |
| Water Crisis and Remedies |
4 |
Average |
| Air traffic control |
5 |
Average |
| Resource utilizations in organization |
3 |
Difficult |
| Organization and learning |
4 |
Difficult |
SECTION V: General Awareness section
In jumbled paper appears these questions appear as breather in between and could be attempted in passing looks with out putting in serious effort.
So we can sum this analysis as:
| Expected Score (excluding GK) | Expected percentile |
| 80 + | 99 percentile |
| 75-80 | 95 percentile |
| 68-75 | 90 percentile |
Tags: MAT paper analysis, MAT2008 paper analysis, May 2008 MAT, MBA paper analysis
Leave a Trackback
Comments
Leave a Reply
